Biopsy of focal liver lesions : guidelines, comparison of techniques and cost-analysis
Journal | Volume 66 - 2003 |
Issue | Fasc.2 - Symposium |
Author(s) | S.M. Francque, F.F. De Pauw, G.H. Van den Steen, E.A. Van Marck, P.A. Pelckmans, P.P. Michielsen |
Full article |
VIEW FREE PDF |
(1) Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and (2) Division of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium. |
When a focal liver lesion is discovered, differentiation between a benign and malignant nature and further characterization are mandatory to guide further treatment. Histology remains the gol- den standard. Improving imaging techniques such as contrast enhanced Doppler ultrasonography, spiral CT and new MRI pro- cedures are promising, but not 100% accurate. When there is any doubt, biopsy should be performed. Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB) has a high sensitivity and specificity (90-95%) in expe- rienced hands, but has a high insufficient sampling rate (up to 15%). In a series of 245 Fine Needle Tru-cut Biopsies (FNTCB) of focal solid liver lesions performed at our institution, sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of malignancy were 86% and 100% respectively, with an overall accuracy of 88%. Positive predictive value was 100%, but negative predictive value was rather low (56%). Insufficient sampling rate was low (2.5%), and a more accurate histological characterization was possible compared to FNAB. Finally, the cost-analysis of different biopsy techniques is presented for the Belgian situation according to used materials, pathology procedures and hospitalization. (Acta gastroenterol. belg., 2003, 66, 160-165). |
© Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica. |